40 Comments
User's avatar
Matt Orfalea's avatar

Why write 30 paragraphs about a rumor without saying what exactly is rumored? Why exactly is Brana being accused of harassment? Something he said? An attempt at humor? A mean tweet?

TOM CROFTON's avatar

There were a bunch of issues with communications not mentioned in statuscoup you tube. My thought is this should have stayed a movement and become a party when there were millions working together for issues. Organization building is different than organizing. General strike may be our only hope for real change, elections have way too many roadblocks

Kevin Schmidt's avatar

All I see here are accusations without proof.

As a member of MPP, I witnessed multiple attempts to sabotage the party in one way or another.

After the bad actors were removed, they too made many claims that turned out to be false.

Tom Marino's avatar

No what you did is watch people you worked with on a consistent basis over months get smeared with nonsense and you kept silent and bootlicking. Because you are gutless. Now five people that looked into these accusations, all people you know, some who you worked with for even longer, got disappeared and again you are shamelessly bootlicking.

And nothing said by the official channels of those who dared petition the org to be what it said it is was false. Ever. There were over 200 people who asked for those changes. If some of those individuals said inaccurate things, that's on them. NOTHING we said as a group was EVER false.

Kevin Schmidt's avatar

LOL! I was not privy to what was going on at that level behind closed doors. But you go ahead and blame me for not being a mind reader.

Herschel Sterling's avatar

instead of voting out Brana, the leaders of the WA and CA State Parties removed their Parties from the national org. They are sheepdogging for the Dems and it's going to backfire on them . Between those two states alone they'd have had enough votes to vote Nick out.

Kevin Schmidt's avatar

I think you should go tell Nick that.

Herschel Sterling's avatar

i think you should understand that most people are intelligent enough to understand that without being told. It's so obvious that this is all a hit job. You have to have zero experience with organizing to not understand that. "It's not all about the Lead Organizer", then they make it all about the Lead organizer. So dumb

Elsie H.'s avatar

All I see here is accusations [of bad-faith infiltration] without proof [lol].

If you believe in substantial due process, you should actually support it, but clearly you don’t, so your complaint rings hollow. Poor senpai! Keep going all yandere there!

Kevin Schmidt's avatar

Due process requires proof. You've got nuttin' honey, and you know it!

MeTooMaybe is not a thing. No one believes that smear tactic anymore.

Keep crying about it, when everyone else already forgot it. That's always good for a few more yuks.

Elsie H.'s avatar

But, sure I tOtAlLy believe you about the sabotage despite any proof thereof.

Kevin Schmidt's avatar

Still no proof of, MeTooMaybe, which proves that was the sabotage.

Elsie H.'s avatar

Still no proof of the committee being saboteurs, which proves that the committee itself was sabotaged.

See how easy it is for me to invert your sentences like that? Like literally the only reason I’m mocking you is how laughably easy it is to expend far too many words saying “it you”.

Kevin Schmidt's avatar

I see how easy it is for you to make accusations, yet are unable to post any proof.

You are only making a fool out of yourself.

Elsie H.'s avatar

You literally did not read my comment, but you took the time to respond anyway. Awwwwww!

Kevin Schmidt's avatar

After six long months, you literally cannot let this go. SUX 2BU! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Elsie H.'s avatar

I found my way here via Google after hearing about it secondhand, so it’s news to me lol. Clearly I should have let it go months *before* hearing about it rather than letting morbid curiosity (and Google) get the better of me! Anyway, it’s not like you have anything better to do than cast shade at a rando in the comments on a dead blog, either, no?

Kevin Schmidt's avatar

You know you were the one who revived this dead blog, so don't project your nonsense onto me.

Ace Frahm's avatar

What is a critical thinking outsider supposed to believe? I hear a bunch of accusations, and that's serious, but I haven't heard one single solitary fact or piece of evidence that can be proof of the outrageous claim, either. If the claim is true, why is there no public proof of the claim yet?

Also, I thought it was blatantly obvious that Nick Brana is EXTREMELY gay, and therefore most likely exclusively homosexual, so the allegations of romance with a female, for which no credible support has been shown to the public, don't ring true to me at all. It very well might be true, but how am I supposed to know? I'm definitely not just gonna take the word of strangers for it in this case, for I know it's exactly the kind of thing a villains might try to espouse, and which credulous fools will swallow at face value. But my mind is still open to something that could qualify as authentic proof of the claim.

Herschel Sterling's avatar

It's all smearing so far. No one has pressed charges. Nothing at all in the public record. IMO, he's extremely gracious for not suing for slander or even just pursuing a cease and desist.

Terry's avatar

Hey idiot,Nick Brana is not gay

J-Pat : Jason Patrick Quinn's avatar

Lol same here! I took it as read that Nick Brana was gay. I mean, he’s sooo camp. Good friends of mine whom are gay also said their “Gaydar” was telling them he’s gay. I’m shocked.

nh's avatar

This must bring up some interesting feelings for you, Jordon. Of course, certain "elements" are going to do everything in their power to nip this new party in the bud. It started almost immediately. Every special identity known to humankind is used today for political ammunition whether true or untrue. Sickening. Hang in there, Nick. I wouldn't want your job for all the tea in....wherever.

Elsie H.'s avatar

Of course [a certain party leader is] going to do everything in their power to nip [the movement] in the bud. Every special identity [but particularly aggrieved cisgender white manhood] is used today for political ammunition whether true or untrue. Sickening.

Dave D's avatar

This comments section is filled with cultists. Anyone with a brain knows MPP is garbage just like Brana.

Herschel Sterling's avatar

if they were so concerned abt Nick, why didn't they grow the Party big enough to vote him out? the reason is bc they AREN'T ORGANIZERS. Why did the leaders of the WA & CA parties remove their state orgs from the national org, instead of staying in & voting him out? Bc they're SHEEPDOGS. People who say it's not all abt Nick, and then make it all about Nick are obvious clowns and plants. 100% on the clock. ON THE CLOCK.

Elsie H.'s avatar

If they were so concerned abt [the party], why didn't they [actually hold the board meeting in the first place] to vote him out?

Herschel Sterling's avatar

they never had any intention of being a part of the party. their intention all along was to frustrate the efforts, or use it to sheepdog for dems. if wa and CA and NC for that matter wanted to change the party, the way to do that would have been to simply vote nick out, not leave.

J-Pat : Jason Patrick Quinn's avatar

I assumed Nick Brana was gay. As in 100% homosexual. My gay friends even thought so too.

nofool's avatar

booosheeet! dude has nothing whatsoever to do with women, sexually.

so why do "they" want his ouster, of a sudden? hmmm?

sexual pecadillos are always a cover for something even worse and deeper, politically.

"they" would prefer you talked about the sexual, interpersonal. so what really happened to require his ouster?

these people are so transparent.

Elsie H.'s avatar

Sexual pecadillos are always [the tip of the iceberg] for something even worse and deeper [concerning the accused party], politically.

MrJeanDeaux's avatar

Looking forward to getting your attaboys off Nancy Pelosi et al, Jordan?

Boris Petrov's avatar

ukrainegate.info nice summary of Bidens' corrupt rule in Ukraine (found the link in Comments – never seen it before)

https://ukrainegate.info/short-part-1-a-not-so-solid-prosecutor/